For most school districts, looming budget challenges are the result of long-term socioeconomic trends. ESSER is just a small piece of the K-12 fiscal cliff puzzle.
Districts and communities have long been experiencing:
But shorter-term trends, like ESSER, become an easy target for budget crunch blame. When the media puts numbers like $190 billion in headlines, people assume it will be transformative because they apply it to their own lives.
Let's put $190 billion in context.
Does an extra ~$640 per student per year still feel transformational?
(In our national survey with EdWeek, only 3% of teachers and administrators said pandemic aid was "transformational." Distributions also varied widely between districts. The median amount was less than the average: $467 per student per year.)
Here's another way to look at it. If you get a 5% bonus, are you going to run out and buy a new house? Probably not. You understand that a bonus is a bonus and a salary is a salary. Similarly, district CFOs understand the difference between baseline operating funds and one-time supplemental grant funding for emergency purchases.
The public narrative seems to suggest that all ESSER dollars were used for recurring needs that now must be cut.
Here are a few strategies to counter this narrative:
Even if ESSER dollars plugged some operational holes (staving off layoffs for example), the last 3+ years did not cause those underlying budget challenges.
Yes, $190 billion is a big number worth honest scrutiny, but we can't let it cloud the much bigger picture.
November 28, 2023